| Sexsearch.com is a scam! Sexsearch is a perfect example of what I have been saying., spammers lie, and people who spammers lie. It seems as though Sexsearch is a scam in its entirety -- a shadow entity, with fake profiles, and programmed to cheat its affiliates. Sexsearch.com not only puts up fake profiles, skims from their affiliates. Ed Kunkle, the COO of Sexsearch, claimed he found his fiancÚ/wife/girlfriend on Sexsearch. One ex-employee stated, in the context Sexsearch being sued for providing a 15 y/o girl for sex (and the case talked about Sexsearch providing pornography to the same girl), that he was shocked that anyone could contact a real woman through Sexsearch -- given the amount of fake female profiles -- implying that there are no real women members on the web site. Maybe this picture is Ed Kunkle's fiancé/wife/girlfriend -- or was Ed lying?|
You may have been spammed by Experienced Internet aka Sexsearch.com or their agents. I have identified the following strings/links as advertising Sexsearch:
The spam I received containing the above links had deceptive headers, failed to include required labeling, and failed to include a physical address. I am willing to provide a declaration, if you need that for any legal action you are taking against Experienced Internet aka Sexsearch.
Of Course, Experienced claims that they only lease the sexsearch.com domain to another company and they collect the money for Sexsearch for this other company. This other company then contracts out to another company who then contracts out to a third company that pays the person to be the Sexsearch president. Confused?? I am, it sounds more like a scam. Would any legitimate business that didn't scam people and cheat people out of money be set up like this?? I don't think so.
April 5, 2005: Hearing was held. Defendant didn't make mention of their request for an undertaking -- probably because they knew it was a stupid idea. Tim had to take some time to explain WHOIS to the judge so that the judge would see that the defendants have California ties.
March 22, 2005: Defendant filed a reply to our opposition to their motion to dismiss. Their reply is nuts!!! Defendants claim that any information on the internet is not admissible evidence. Defendants still claim that they can hire spammers to spam, but are not responsible for their actions.
February 28, 2005: Defendants filed an motion to dismiss under Federal Rule 12(b)(2), 12(b)(3), 12(b)(6). They also move to change venue to Florida or Los Angeles. The claim that they don't spam, that they don't have an affiliate program, they don't do business in California. Lets take a look through the lens of truth:
Their lawyers, Gary Jay Kaufman and Marijana Stanojevic, know or should know that Experienced Internet are spammers as Timothy Walton, my attorney, provided them with the links to many, many spam complaints against them. I guess "The rules of spam" may also apply to spammer's attorneys.
January 11, 2004: Sued Experienced Internet.com, Inc -- better known as sexsearch.com, Patricia Quesada, Sylvia Bedoya, and DOES 1-50 in Federal court for spamming. This is for their spamming for their site, Sexsearch.com.
They were asked to stop spamming my domain, but they continued. They violated California and Federal law by using deceptive headers and failing to label their spam as sexually explicit.
A copy of the complaint is here.
More to come soon.
Shop Amazon's Outlet Deals in Computers, Office & Software Computers,
Another William Silverstein
site. Copyright ©2002-2013 William Silverstein. All rights
This site is copyrighted material and its use is subject to non-exclusive license. If you do not agree to the terms of this license, leave this site immediately, or you are bound by the terms of the license. Your use of this site signifies your agreement to be bound by the terms of this license. The use of this site is free for personal and non-commercial use - particularly for those wish to learn about and protect the rights of employees and those who oppose their abuse by employers and large corporations, but there are significant fees charged for certain other uses.
This page are the opinions of William Silverstein based on facts and information provided to him. This is not to be construed as legal advice. Mattel is the manufacturer of Barbie, Matchbox, and Hot Wheels. This site is neither approved nor endorsed by Mattel. All trademarks belong to their respective owners.